So is it small or large? Or is there not going to be that much difference?

Welcome to one of the longest running forums dedicated to the art of fingerstyle guitar
Acoustic Fingerstyle Guitar has partnered with Homespun to deliver their library of music instruction DVDs to you (including the accompanying music/TAB booklet) quickly, safely and inexpensively using their amazing new system called Homespun Instant Access. Check it out.
| Author | Comment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
gtrfinger |
Small or large diaphragm condenser microphone for recording |
Lead | ||
|
Need an answer fast people, my parents have said they'll get me a good mic for Christmas, and have been given a good deal on the large-d AKG C 3000 B.
However there seems to be some differing in opinion of whether a small-d would be better. I play only fingerstyle, the mic would only be used for recording at
home. I've read that large d capture more warmth, but small d better for intricate playing.
So is it small or large? Or is there not going to be that much difference? |
||||
|
|
||||
Paul Kucharski |
#1 | |||
|
Small diaphrams are suppose to have better high frequency response since there is less mass to move. But you have to have a pretty good ear to hear those
differences. You could get by just fine with a C3000, but if you want small, the C1000 is a good choice. That's what I have and it's a nice mic and not
extremely expensive.
|
||||
|
|
||||
gtrfinger |
#2 | |||
|
Thanks very much Paul for your speedy response. I'll probably go with the C3000 - its in a sale, and much less than half price. I'll let you know how i
get on.
|
||||
|
|
||||
Rick Ruskin |
#3 | |||
|
The Shure SM81 would be a better choice than either of the AKG's mentioned. What good is a bargain if you end up not liking it?
Rick Ruskin
http://liondogmusic.com http://www.myspace.com/rickruskin |
||||
|
|
||||
The "Soundhole" Guitar Talk Forum
Grossman's Woodshed Forum